The `fmesher`

geometry tool in the INLA package has several features that aren’t widely known. The code started as an implementation of the triangulation method detailed in Hjelle and Dæhlen, “Triangulations and Applications” (2006), which includes methods for spatially varying mesh quality.^{1} Over time, the interface and feature improvements focused on robustness and calculating useful mesh properties, but the more advanced mesh quality features are still there!

The algorithm first builds a basic mesh, including any points the user specifies, as well as any boundary curves (if no boundary curve is given, a default boundary will be added), connecting all the points into a Delauney triangulation.

After this initial step, mesh quality is decided by two criteria:

- Minimum allowed angle in a triangle
- Maximum allowed triangle edge length

As long as any triangle does not fulfil the criteria, a new mesh point is added in a way that is guaranteed to locally fix the problem, and a new Delaunay triangulation is obtained. This process is repeated until all triangles fulfil the criteria. In perfect arithmetic, the algorithm is guaranteed to converge as long as the minimum angle criterion is at most 21 degrees, and the maximum edge length criterion is strictly positive.

A basic mesh with regular interior triangles can be created as follows:

```
# See INLA installation instructions on http://www.r-inla.org/download
library(INLA)
# For ggplot2 mesh methods; install inlabru from CRAN
library(inlabru)
library(ggplot2)
loc <- as.matrix(expand.grid(1:10, 1:10))
bnd <- inla.nonconvex.hull(loc, convex = 1, concave = 10)
mesh1 <- inla.mesh.create(loc = loc,
boundary = list(bnd),
refine = list(max.edge = Inf))
ggplot() + gg(mesh1) + coord_equal()
```

The `inla.nonconvex.hull`

function creates a polygon to be used as the boundary of the mesh, extending the domain by a distance `convex`

from the given points, while keeping the outside curvature radius to at least `concave`

. In this simple example, we used the method `inla.mesh.create`

, which is the most direct interface to `fmesher`

. The `refine = list(max.edge = Inf)`

setting makes `fmesher`

enforce the default minimum angle criterion (21 degrees) but ignore the edge length criterion. To get smaller triangles, we change the `max.edge`

value:

```
mesh2 <- inla.mesh.create(loc = loc,
boundary = list(bnd),
refine = list(max.edge = 0.5))
ggplot() + gg(mesh2) + coord_equal()
```

It is often possible and desirable to increase the minimum allowed angle to achieve smooth transitions between small and large triangles (values as high as 26 or 27, but almost never as high as 35, may be possible). Here we will instead focus on the edge length criterion, and make that spatially varying.

We now define a function that computes our desired maximal edge length as a function of location, and feed the output of that to `inla.mesh.create`

using the `quality.spec`

parameter instead of `max.edge`

:

```
qual_loc <- function(loc) {
pmax(0.05, (loc[, 1] * 2 + loc[, 2]) / 16)
}
mesh3 <- inla.mesh.create(loc = loc,
boundary = list(bnd),
refine = list(max.edge = Inf),
quality.spec = list(loc = qual_loc(loc),
segm = qual_loc(bnd$loc)))
ggplot() + gg(mesh3) + coord_equal()
```

This gave a smooth transition between large and small triangles!

We can also use different settings on the boundary, e.g. `NA_real_`

or `Inf`

to make it not care about edge lengths near the boundary:

```
qual_bnd <- function(loc) {
rep(Inf, nrow(loc))
}
mesh5 <- inla.mesh.create(loc = loc,
boundary = list(bnd),
refine = list(max.edge = Inf),
quality.spec = list(loc = qual_loc(loc),
segm = qual_bnd(bnd$loc)))
ggplot() + gg(mesh5) + coord_equal()
```

We can also make more complicated specifications, but beware of asking only for reasonable triangulations; When experimenting, I recommend setting the `max.n.strict`

and `max.n`

values in the `refine`

parameter list, that prohibits adding infinitely many triangles!

```
qual_bnd <- function(loc) {
pmax(0.1, 1 - abs(loc[,2] / 10)^2)
}
mesh5 <- inla.mesh.create(loc = loc,
boundary = list(bnd),
refine = list(max.edge = Inf,
max.n.strict = 5000),
quality.spec = list(loc = qual_loc(loc),
segm = qual_bnd(bnd$loc)))
ggplot() + gg(mesh5) + coord_equal()
```

The `inla.mesh.assessment`

function may also provide some insights:

```
out <- inla.mesh.assessment(mesh5,
spatial.range = 5,
alpha = 2,
dims = c(200, 200))
print(names(out))
```

`## [1] "sd" "sd.dev" "edge.len"`

`ggplot() + gg(out, aes(color = edge.len)) + coord_equal()`

A “good” mesh should have `sd.dev`

close to 1; this indicates that the nominal variance specified by the continuous domain model and the variance of the discretise model are similar.

```
ggplot() + gg(out, aes(color = sd.dev)) + coord_equal() +
scale_color_gradient(limits = range(out$sd.dev, na.rm = TRUE))
```

Here, we see that the standard deviation of the discretised model is smaller in the triangle interiors than at the vertices, but the ratio is close to 1, and more uniform where the triangles are small compared with the spatial correlation length that we set to `5`

. The most problematic points seem to be in the rapid transition between large and small triangles. We can improve things by increasing the minimum angle criterion:

```
mesh6 <- inla.mesh.create(loc = loc,
boundary = list(bnd),
refine = list(min.angle = 30,
max.edge = Inf,
max.n.strict = 5000),
quality.spec = list(loc = qual_loc(loc),
segm = qual_bnd(bnd$loc)))
out6 <- inla.mesh.assessment(mesh6,
spatial.range = 5,
alpha = 2,
dims = c(200, 200))
ggplot() + gg(out6, aes(color = sd.dev)) + coord_equal() +
scale_color_gradient(limits = range(out$sd.dev, na.rm = TRUE))
```